Point-of-care imaging

Lung Ultrasound

The bedside scan that distinguishes consolidation from collapse from effusion in minutes — what the signs mean, what the evidence supports, and where it sits in physiotherapy scope.

For clinicians
Chest CT Scan Outcome Measures & Clinical Skills · 9 of 37 Ventilation–Perfusion (V/Q) Scanning
Authorship & review
Dr Sean James Ledger, BSc Physio (Hons) MSc PhD FHEA
Director and Principal Physiotherapist
Ahpra registration PHY0002298174
Version
1.0
Last updated
12 August 2026
Next review
12 August 2027
Every guide on this site is reviewed at least once a year, and sooner when the evidence changes.
How these guides are written and reviewed →
In plain language

Lung ultrasound answers, at the bedside and in minutes, the question that most often decides a respiratory treatment: is this consolidation, collapse, effusion or oedema? For several of those it is more accurate than both auscultation and the portable chest X-ray. It is operator-dependent, requires formal training, and in Australia sits behind credentialing for physiotherapists — but understanding the images is useful whether or not you hold the probe.

What you are actually looking at

Ultrasound cannot penetrate air, so normal lung produces no image at all — what is seen are artefacts generated at the pleural line, and those artefacts are the diagnostic information. As air is replaced by fluid or tissue, the lung becomes progressively more visible. That single principle explains every sign below.

The core signs

SignAppearanceMeans
Lung slidingShimmering movement of the pleural line with respirationVisceral and parietal pleura in contact and moving — effectively excludes pneumothorax at that point1
A-linesHorizontal repeating echoes below the pleural lineNormal, aerated lung — or, if sliding is absent, pneumothorax
B-linesVertical “comet tail” artefacts to the bottom of the screen, moving with slidingInterstitial syndrome. Three or more in one view is abnormal; bilateral and diffuse suggests cardiogenic pulmonary oedema1
ConsolidationTissue-like (“hepatised”) lung, often with air bronchogramsAlveolar filling — pneumonia, atelectasis or contusion, distinguished by the bronchogram behaviour below
Pleural effusionAnechoic space above the diaphragm, spine visible beyond itFluid — quantifiable and directly markable for drainage
Lung pointThe exact point where sliding starts and stops within one viewSpecific for pneumothorax and marks its edge1

The distinction that changes physiotherapy

Consolidated lung looks similar whether it is infected or collapsed. The differentiator is the air bronchogram:

This is precisely the question auscultation cannot answer, and the one on which a portable chest X-ray is often equivocal. A systematic review in Journal of Physiotherapy found lung ultrasound more accurate than conventional respiratory assessment for pleural effusion, consolidation and collapse.2

How it compares

FindingLung ultrasoundPortable chest X-ray
PneumothoraxHigh sensitivity, markedly better than supine radiography3Poor when supine — air collects anteriorly and is easily missed
Pleural effusionHighly accurate; volume estimated and site marked1,2Insensitive to small effusions; supine films mislead
Consolidation / collapseAccurate, and distinguishes the two2Frequently cannot separate them
Interstitial oedemaB-line pattern is sensitive and appears early1,4Later and less sensitive
RadiationNone — repeatable as often as neededCumulative dose, and a wait for the film

The BLUE protocol

Lichtenstein's BLUE protocol applies a small number of standard points to acute respiratory failure and reaches a diagnosis in around three minutes with high accuracy.4 The value for physiotherapy is not the algorithm itself so much as its discipline: scan the same points, in the same order, every time, comparing left with right, so that serial scans are comparable and change is real rather than an artefact of where the probe was placed.

Diaphragm ultrasound

The same machine assesses the diaphragm directly, which is otherwise almost invisible to clinical examination.

Both give an objective number where the alternative is inference, and both can be repeated daily without dose.

Scope, training and governance

Competence is not conferred by access to a machineLung ultrasound is highly operator-dependent, and its accuracy figures come from trained operators. In Australia, physiotherapists performing thoracic ultrasound require appropriate training, credentialing and local governance, with scanning within a defined scope and documented supervision.6,7 Image acquisition, image interpretation and the clinical decision are three separable competencies — a service should be explicit about which of them each clinician holds.

Practical limits worth knowing regardless: it is blind to anything surrounded by aerated lung, degraded by subcutaneous emphysema and surgical dressings, difficult over large body habitus, and unable to see the mediastinum. It complements the chest X-ray and CT rather than replacing either.

What this means for physiotherapy

Related: Chest X-ray and chest CT for the structural picture, auscultation for what the stethoscope can and cannot add, and manual hyperinflation & suctioning for the interventions this scan should be selecting between.

References & evidence base

  1. Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, et al. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(4):577–591.
  2. Hansell L, Milross M, Delaney A, Tian DH, Ntoumenopoulos G. Lung ultrasound has greater accuracy than conventional respiratory assessment tools for the diagnosis of pleural effusion, lung consolidation and collapse: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2021;67(1):41–48.
  3. Alrajab S, Youssef AM, Akkus NI, Caldito G. Pleural ultrasonography versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax: review of the literature and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R208.
  4. Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest. 2008;134(1):117–125.
  5. Goligher EC, Laghi F, Detsky ME, et al. Measuring diaphragm thickness with ultrasound in mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility, reproducibility and validity. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(4):642–649.
  6. Le Neindre A, Mongodi S, Philippart F, Bouhemad B. Thoracic ultrasound: potential new tool for physiotherapists in respiratory management. A narrative review. J Crit Care. 2016;31(1):101–109.
  7. Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine. Standards of Practice. Sydney: ASUM; 2024.

References are numbered in citation order (Vancouver/BMJ style) and were current at the time of writing. Guidelines are living documents — verify against the latest version before clinical use.

Important: This page is written for health professionals as a summary of published evidence and guidance. It is not medical advice, does not replace the source documents, and does not substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Corrections: If something on this page is wrong, out of date or unclear, we want to know. Email reception@inspireclinic.au with the page name and what you believe is incorrect. Substantive corrections are made promptly, and the guide’s version and last-updated date are changed to reflect it.