Ahpra registration PHY0002298174
How these guides are written and reviewed →
An oesophagectomy removes the food pipe, usually for cancer, and rebuilds it by pulling the stomach up into the chest. It is one of the biggest operations in general surgery, involving both the abdomen and the chest, and chest complications afterwards are common. This page explains the approaches, what goes wrong, and what physiotherapy can and cannot change.
The operation and its approaches
The oesophagus is resected and continuity restored by forming a gastric conduit from the stomach and drawing it up into the chest or neck. The approach determines which cavities are opened and where the anastomosis sits — both of which matter for physiotherapy.
| Approach | Access | Anastomosis |
|---|---|---|
| Ivor Lewis | Laparotomy plus right thoracotomy | Intrathoracic — a leak drains into the chest |
| McKeown (three-stage) | Abdomen, chest and neck | Cervical — a leak drains to the neck, generally less catastrophic but with higher recurrent laryngeal nerve risk |
| Transhiatal | Abdomen and neck; no thoracotomy | Cervical |
| Minimally invasive / hybrid | Laparoscopic and/or thoracoscopic | Either — fewer pulmonary complications than fully open1 |
The TIME trial randomised open against minimally invasive oesophagectomy and found a substantial reduction in pulmonary infection in the minimally invasive arm, which is the main reason the approach has become standard where expertise allows.1
Why the pulmonary complication rate is so high
Oesophagectomy combines almost every risk factor for a post-operative pulmonary complication in one operation:
- An upper abdominal incision and a thoracotomy — the two highest-risk sites, in the same patient.
- Prolonged anaesthesia, frequently with single-lung ventilation.
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy immediately beforehand, leaving patients deconditioned, sarcopenic and often anaemic at the point of surgery.
- Malnutrition and weight loss from the disease itself.
- Recurrent laryngeal nerve vulnerability, particularly with a cervical anastomosis.
- A stomach in the chest, which reduces the space available for lung expansion and predisposes to reflux and aspiration.
Benchmarking work across high-volume international centres puts overall complication rates around 60% with pneumonia in the region of 15–25% even in expert hands.2 This is not a low-risk operation anywhere.
Complications that change physiotherapy management
| Complication | Implication |
|---|---|
| Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy | Weak, breathy voice; ineffective cough because the glottis cannot close; silent aspiration risk. A hoarse voice after oesophagectomy is a respiratory finding, not a cosmetic one — refer to speech pathology and modify clearance expectations. |
| Anastomotic leak | Presents with fever, tachycardia, new arrhythmia or deterioration. Intrathoracic leaks are life-threatening. Physiotherapy stops; escalate. |
| Pneumonia and ARDS | The dominant cause of post-operative mortality. |
| Chyle leak | High-volume milky drain output once feeding starts; managed medically or surgically. |
| Atrial fibrillation | Common, and often the first sign of an anastomotic leak rather than an isolated problem. New atrial fibrillation (AF) should prompt a look for sepsis. |
| Delayed gastric emptying | Regurgitation and aspiration risk, particularly when lying flat. |
| Feeding jejunostomy | Nutrition is delivered enterally for weeks. The tube limits some positions and is a site of pain and infection. |
The gastric conduit sits in the chest and there is no functioning lower oesophageal sphincter. Lying flat risks regurgitation and aspiration into a lung that is already compromised. Head-up positioning is the default, including overnight, and this persists well beyond the inpatient stay. Confirm any head-down or flat positioning with the surgical team — postural drainage in the head-down position is generally inappropriate in this group.
Prehabilitation and the PREPARE trial
Given the risk profile, pre-operative optimisation is attractive, and inspiratory muscle training was an obvious candidate. PREPARE randomised 241 patients awaiting oesophagectomy to pre-operative IMT or usual care and found no reduction in post-operative pneumonia despite a clear increase in inspiratory muscle strength.3
This is an instructive negative result. Earlier smaller work had suggested benefit,4 and meta-analyses across mixed cardiothoracic and upper abdominal populations remain broadly positive.5 PREPARE demonstrates that improving a physiological intermediate does not guarantee a clinical outcome, and that findings do not transfer freely between surgical populations. It does not invalidate IMT elsewhere — it does mean IMT should not be presented as an evidence-based means of preventing pneumonia specifically after oesophagectomy.
What remains well supported is the broader package: a pre-operative physiotherapy education contact of the kind tested in upper abdominal surgery,6 exercise-based prehabilitation for capacity, smoking cessation, and nutritional optimisation within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways.7
Post-operative management
- Mobilise early and progressively. ERAS guidance for oesophagectomy specifies early mobilisation with a structured daily target.7
- Sit up. Head-up positioning is both a respiratory and an anti-reflux intervention here.
- Assess the voice. Hoarseness changes the cough, the aspiration risk and the clearance plan.
- Analgesia first. Two incisions in two cavities; inadequate analgesia makes every respiratory intervention futile.
- Differentiate the problem. Volume loss, sputum retention, effusion and early leak look similar at the bedside and are managed entirely differently. See Post-operative Pulmonary Complications.
- Shoulder and thoracic mobility where a thoracotomy was used — see VATS and thoracotomy.
Longer-term recovery
Recovery is measured in months. Patients eat small volumes frequently, remain at risk of reflux and aspiration, and commonly lose substantial weight and muscle mass. Exercise capacity is often limited by deconditioning and sarcopenia rather than by ventilation, which makes progressive resistance work as relevant as aerobic training. Dumping syndrome, early satiety and fatigue all interact with rehabilitation and are worth asking about directly.
Role of the physiotherapist
Before surgery, deliver the education contact and build capacity in the window between neoadjuvant treatment and theatre — but do not sell IMT as pneumonia prevention in this population. After surgery, mobilise early, keep the patient head-up, assess the voice, advocate for analgesia, and distinguish a respiratory complication from a surgical one quickly, because the second needs a surgeon rather than a treatment.
Evidence summary
Framing. Oesophagectomy has the highest pulmonary complication burden of any elective operation, and pneumonia is the principal driver of post-operative mortality.2 The population arrives deconditioned by neoadjuvant therapy and malnourished by the disease, so the pre-operative window is both the most valuable and the most constrained opportunity for intervention.
Evidence — surgical approachTIME established that minimally invasive oesophagectomy substantially reduces pulmonary infection compared with open surgery, and ERAS Society guidance now codifies minimally invasive access, early mobilisation, restrictive fluid therapy and early enteral nutrition.1,7
Evidence — the negative IMT resultPREPARE (n=241) found no reduction in post-operative pneumonia from pre-operative inspiratory muscle training despite achieving the intended gain in inspiratory muscle strength.3 Earlier single-centre work had been encouraging,4 and pooled analyses across mixed surgical populations remain positive.5 The discrepancy is best read as population-specific: in an operation where the complication is driven by two-cavity surgery, single-lung ventilation, aspiration risk and nerve injury, inspiratory muscle strength is unlikely to be the limiting variable.
Clinical reasoningTwo findings should change behaviour immediately. A hoarse voice implies recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, an incompetent glottis and therefore a mechanically ineffective cough plus silent aspiration risk. New atrial fibrillation should trigger consideration of an anastomotic leak rather than being managed as an isolated arrhythmia. Neither is a physiotherapy problem to treat, but both are physiotherapy problems to detect.
Evidence gapsNo trial has tested a targeted post-operative physiotherapy model against usual care within a contemporary minimally invasive oesophagectomy pathway. Optimal prehabilitation content and timing relative to neoadjuvant therapy are undefined. The respiratory consequences of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy are well described clinically but have no dedicated rehabilitation evidence base.
References & evidence base
- Biere SSAY, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial (TIME). Lancet 2012;379(9829):1887–1892.
- Low DE, Kuppusamy MK, Alderson D, et al. Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2019;269(2):291–298.
- Valkenet K, Trappenburg JCA, Ruurda JP, et al. Multicentre randomized clinical trial of inspiratory muscle training versus usual care before surgery for oesophageal cancer (PREPARE). Br J Surg 2018;105(5):502–511.
- van Adrichem EJ, Meulenbroek RL, Plukker JTM, Groen H, van Weert E. Comparison of two preoperative inspiratory muscle training programs to prevent pulmonary complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy: a randomized controlled pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21(7):2353–2360.
- Mans CM, Reeve JC, Elkins MR. Postoperative outcomes following preoperative inspiratory muscle training in patients undergoing cardiothoracic or upper abdominal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil 2015;29(5):426–438.
- Boden I, Skinner EH, Browning L, et al. Preoperative physiotherapy for the prevention of respiratory complications after upper abdominal surgery (LIPPSMAck-POP): pragmatic, double blinded, multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2018;360:j5916.
- Low DE, Allum W, De Manzoni G, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. World J Surg 2019;43(2):299–330.
References are numbered in citation order (Vancouver/BMJ style) and were current at the time of writing. Guidelines are living documents — verify against the latest version before clinical use.
Physiotherapy around major chest, cardiac and upper abdominal procedures — from open surgery to bronchoscopic, catheter-based and bedside treatments — aims to reduce chest complications and shorten the return to normal function.
Corrections: If something on this page is wrong, out of date or unclear, we want to know. Email reception@inspireclinic.au with the page name and what you believe is incorrect. Substantive corrections are made promptly, and the guide’s version and last-updated date are changed to reflect it.