Type 2 inflammation

Allergy & Eosinophil Testing

Eosinophils, IgE and FeNO — the markers that decide who benefits from inhaled corticosteroids, who qualifies for a biologic, and what a positive allergy test does and does not prove.

For clinicians
Arterial & Venous Blood Gases Outcome Measures & Clinical Skills · 14 of 37 Auscultation
Authorship & review
Dr Sean James Ledger, BSc Physio (Hons) MSc PhD FHEA
Director and Principal Physiotherapist
Ahpra registration PHY0002298174
Version
1.1
Last updated
16 August 2026
Next review
16 August 2027
Every guide on this site is reviewed at least once a year, and sooner when the evidence changes.
How these guides are written and reviewed →
In plain language

Airways disease is no longer managed as one condition. A blood eosinophil count, a total IgE and a FeNO reading now determine which inhaled therapy helps, which patient is eligible for a biologic, and which “severe asthma” is actually something else. These are inexpensive, widely available tests that are still under-used — and frequently over-interpreted.

Why this matters more than it used to

Two shifts have moved these tests from allergy clinics into everyday respiratory practice. In asthma, the biologics are targeted at specific inflammatory pathways, and eligibility is defined by biomarkers rather than by symptoms.1,2 In COPD, the blood eosinophil count now sits inside the treatment algorithm itself.3

Both mean that a patient labelled “difficult asthma” without a documented eosinophil count and IgE has not been fully assessed.

Blood eosinophil count

An absolute count from a routine full blood count — no special test required.

SettingThresholdWhat it indicates
COPD<100 cells/µLLittle benefit expected from inhaled corticosteroids3
COPD≥300 cells/µLFavours adding an inhaled corticosteroid in a patient with exacerbations3
Asthma≥150–300 cells/µLEosinophilic phenotype; supports anti-IL-5/5R and anti-IL-4Rα eligibility, thresholds varying by agent and by PBS criteria1,2
Any>1500 cells/µL, persistentInvestigate beyond asthma — EGPA, parasitic infection, drug reaction, haematological cause
The trap: corticosteroids suppress the countA blood eosinophil count taken during or shortly after a course of oral corticosteroids, or in a patient on maintenance prednisolone, can read near zero regardless of the underlying phenotype. A single suppressed count is not evidence of a non-eosinophilic patient. Where the result will drive a treatment decision, repeat it when the patient is stable and off systemic steroids, and use the highest recent value rather than the most recent.1

Counts also vary day to day and with diurnal rhythm, so serial values are more reliable than one.

Total IgE

Total serum IgE has two distinct uses, and they are often confused.

A normal total IgE does not exclude allergy, and a raised total IgE on its own proves nothing: it rises with parasitic infection, smoking, eczema and a number of immunodeficiencies.

Specific IgE and skin prick testing

These identify sensitisation to a particular allergen — house dust mite, grass and tree pollens, cat, dog, moulds, cockroach. Skin prick testing is fast, cheap and read in 15 minutes; specific IgE blood testing (formerly “RAST”) is used when antihistamines cannot be withheld, when skin disease prevents testing, or where anaphylaxis risk makes skin testing unwise.

Sensitisation is not allergyA positive test means the patient has IgE to that allergen. It becomes clinically meaningful only when it matches the history — symptoms on exposure, seasonality, occupational or domestic pattern. Testing a broad panel in someone with no exposure history reliably produces positives that lead nowhere, and can lead to unnecessary avoidance advice that costs a family a pet or a home.

Two specific tests earn their place in respiratory practice regardless of the general panel: Aspergillus fumigatus specific IgE and Aspergillus IgG. Both are required for the diagnosis of ABPA, which should be actively excluded in poorly controlled asthma, in bronchiectasis with recurrent mucus plugging, and in cystic fibrosis.4,5 See allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.

FeNO — exhaled nitric oxide

FeNO is a point-of-care marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation, measured in parts per billion on a simple exhaled manoeuvre. It is now part of the diagnostic pathway for asthma in the UK joint guideline6 and supports biologic selection alongside eosinophils.1

Adult valueInterpretation7
<25 ppbEosinophilic inflammation and corticosteroid responsiveness unlikely
25–50 ppbIntermediate — interpret with the clinical picture
>50 ppbEosinophilic inflammation likely; supports corticosteroid responsiveness

What lowers FeNO: inhaled or oral corticosteroids (which is the point — a high FeNO in a treated patient suggests non-adherence or poor inhaler technique before it suggests treatment failure), smoking, and acute bronchoconstriction. What raises it: allergic rhinitis, atopy and recent allergen exposure. Values in children are lower.

Before escalating therapy on a high FeNO, check the inhaler. Persistent type 2 inflammation in a patient prescribed adequate inhaled corticosteroid is more often a delivery problem than a drug problem — see inhaler technique.

Putting it together

PictureSuggests
High eosinophils, high FeNO, high IgE with positive aeroallergen testsAllergic eosinophilic asthma — several biologic options; confirm adherence first
High eosinophils, high FeNO, normal IgE, adult onset, nasal polypsNon-allergic eosinophilic asthma — anti-IL-5/5R territory
Very high IgE, Aspergillus IgE and IgG positive, central bronchiectasis, pluggingABPA until proven otherwise4,5
Normal eosinophils, normal FeNO, poor response to inhaled therapyReconsider the diagnosis — breathing pattern disorder, EILO, reflux, cardiac cause, deconditioning

That final row is the one physiotherapy sees most. A patient with normal type 2 markers and no bronchodilator response is unlikely to improve on more inhaled therapy, and is exactly the patient in whom breathing pattern disorder and exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction are missed.

What this means for physiotherapy

References & evidence base

  1. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: 2026 update. GINA; 2026. Available at: ginasthma.org
  2. Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme: Section 100 Highly Specialised Drugs — severe asthma biologics. PBS Schedule; 2026.
  3. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of COPD: 2026 report. GOLD; 2026. Available at: goldcopd.org
  4. Agarwal R, Chakrabarti A, Shah A, et al. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: review of literature and proposal of new diagnostic and classification criteria. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;43(8):850–873.
  5. Agarwal R, Sehgal IS, Muthu V, et al. Revised ISHAM-ABPA working group clinical practice guidelines for diagnosing, classifying and treating allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Eur Respir J. 2024;63(4):2400061.
  6. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, British Thoracic Society, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Asthma: diagnosis, monitoring and chronic asthma management. NICE guideline NG245. London: NICE; 2024.
  7. Dweik RA, Boggs PB, Erzurum SC, et al. An official ATS clinical practice guideline: interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels (FeNO) for clinical applications. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(5):602–615.

References are numbered in citation order (Vancouver/BMJ style) and were current at the time of writing. Guidelines are living documents — verify against the latest version before clinical use.

Important: This page is written for health professionals as a summary of published evidence and guidance. It is not medical advice, does not replace the source documents, and does not substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Corrections: If something on this page is wrong, out of date or unclear, we want to know. Email reception@inspireclinic.au with the page name and what you believe is incorrect. Substantive corrections are made promptly, and the guide’s version and last-updated date are changed to reflect it.