Respiratory conditions

Exercise-Induced Laryngeal Obstruction (EILO)

The voice box narrowing during hard exercise, causing sudden noisy breathlessness.

For patients & health professionals
Empyema A–Z of Conditions · 28 of 86 Flail Chest
Authorship & review
Dr Sean James Ledger, BSc Physio (Hons) MSc PhD FHEA
Director and Principal Physiotherapist
Ahpra registration PHY0002298174
Version
1.0
Last updated
12 August 2026
Next review
12 August 2027
Every guide on this site is reviewed at least once a year, and sooner when the evidence changes.
How these guides are written and reviewed →
Part 1 · In plain language

Exercise-Induced Laryngeal Obstruction (EILO) is when the voice box — the larynx, at the top of the windpipe — closes in too far while you are exercising hard, so air cannot get in freely. It causes noisy, difficult breathing in, tightness at the throat rather than the chest, and a feeling of not being able to get enough air. It comes on near maximum effort and settles within a few minutes of stopping, which is what separates it from asthma. It is common in fit teenagers and young athletes, and it is very often mistaken for asthma and treated with inhalers that do not help. Breathing retraining with a physiotherapist or speech pathologist is the mainstay of treatment, and most people improve. This page covers what EILO is, how it is diagnosed and how it is managed.

Definition

Exercise-Induced Laryngeal Obstruction (EILO) is an inappropriate, transient narrowing of the larynx that occurs during high-intensity exercise and resolves rapidly once exercise stops. It is the exercise-triggered form of inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO), the umbrella term agreed by the European Respiratory Society and European Laryngological Society for reversible upper-airway narrowing in response to a trigger.1 The older labels vocal cord dysfunction, paradoxical vocal fold motion and exercise-induced laryngomalacia describe overlapping phenomena; the 2013 international consensus replaced them with the ILO nomenclature, which classifies obstruction by the level at which it occurs and by its trigger.2

Pathophysiology

At high ventilatory rates the pressure inside the upper airway falls sharply on each breath in. Normally the laryngeal muscles counteract this by actively widening the inlet. In EILO that opening fails, and structures are drawn inwards instead. Two patterns are recognised, and they frequently coexist:3

Because the obstruction is at the laryngeal inlet and not in the small airways, the difficulty is predominantly on breathing in, and it disappears within minutes of stopping — the larynx reopens as soon as ventilatory demand falls. This is a mechanical and neuromuscular control problem, not an inflammatory one, which is why anti-inflammatory and bronchodilator therapy does not resolve it.1

Co-morbidities

EILO commonly sits alongside other conditions, and identifying them matters because they are treatable in their own right and can amplify symptoms: asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (which may be present as well as EILO, not instead of it), dysfunctional breathing, allergic rhinitis and post-nasal drip, gastro-oesophageal reflux and laryngopharyngeal reflux, chronic cough, and anxiety around performance and competition.4 Reflux and rhinitis in particular increase laryngeal irritability and are worth treating before concluding that breathing retraining has failed.

Prevalence

EILO affects an estimated 5–7% of adolescents and young adults in the general population, with a consistent female predominance.5 Among athletes and physically active young people investigated for unexplained exertional breathlessness, prevalence is much higher — around a third in some series — and EILO is a leading explanation for exercise symptoms that have not responded to asthma treatment.6 It is under-recognised rather than rare.

Causes and triggers

There is no single cause. Recognised contributors and triggers include:

Symptoms

How EILO differs from asthma

FeatureEILOExercise-induced bronchoconstriction (asthma)
TimingDuring exercise, at peak intensityTypically 5–15 minutes after exercise stops
RecoveryFast — minutesSlower — 20–60 minutes, or with a reliever
Phase of breathingInspiratoryExpiratory
SoundStridor at the throatWheeze from the chest
Site of tightnessThroat, neckChest
Response to reliever inhalerLittle or noneGood

The two can coexist, so a confirmed diagnosis of asthma does not exclude EILO — and a negative bronchial provocation test does not exclude it either, because provocation testing does not detect laryngeal obstruction.7

Diagnosis

Why diagnosis matters

EILO is routinely misdiagnosed as difficult asthma. The consequences are real: years of escalating inhaled therapy that cannot work, avoidable side effects, withdrawal from sport, and in some cases emergency presentations for what is a self-limiting laryngeal event. Diagnostic delay of several years from first symptoms to correct diagnosis is common.6 Naming the condition accurately is itself part of the treatment.

How is it diagnosed?

The history does most of the work — inspiratory difficulty, throat-level tightness, onset at peak effort and fast recovery. But history alone cannot distinguish EILO reliably from other causes of exertional breathlessness, so objective testing is recommended wherever it is available.1

Laryngoscopy during exercise

The reference standard is the continuous laryngoscopy exercise (CLE) test, in which a flexible laryngoscope is secured in place while the patient exercises to maximum on a treadmill or bike, so the larynx is watched directly at the moment symptoms occur.8 The obstruction is graded at supraglottic and glottic level using a standardised scoring system, which allows severity and treatment response to be compared over time.9 Resting laryngoscopy is normal in most people with EILO and cannot rule it out.

Lung function

Spirometry is normal between episodes. A truncated or flattened inspiratory limb on the flow–volume loop during symptoms is suggestive but is neither sensitive nor specific enough to diagnose EILO on its own. Exercise or eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea challenge is used to identify or exclude co-existing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction rather than to diagnose EILO itself.10

Investigations for related conditions

Assessment for rhinitis, reflux, vocal pathology and dysfunctional breathing is part of the workup, because these are common, treatable, and will limit the response to laryngeal retraining if left alone.4

Management

Management and goals

The goals are to restore confident, full-effort exercise, to stop unnecessary asthma treatment where EILO is the sole diagnosis, and to give the person a reliable technique they can use the moment symptoms begin. Most people are managed non-surgically.1

Treatment options

Breathing techniques that help

Inspiratory muscle training

Inspiratory muscle training is used as an adjunct: resisted inspiration encourages an actively widened laryngeal inlet and a slower, deeper inspiratory pattern, and it gives a structured home programme between sessions.12 Evidence is limited and it supplements laryngeal retraining rather than replacing it.

Surgery

Supraglottoplasty — trimming the collapsing supraglottic tissue — is considered only for severe supraglottic EILO confirmed on CLE testing that has not responded to therapy. In selected patients, it improves symptoms and exercise capacity.13 It has no role in glottic obstruction.

Identifying an episode

An EILO episode is recognised by its shape: it builds at high effort, is loudest on breathing in, and eases within a few minutes of slowing down. Symptoms that persist beyond that, or that come on after exercise finishes, point to something else — usually exercise-induced bronchoconstriction — and should be reassessed.

Action plan

  1. Reduce intensity as soon as the throat tightens — slow down rather than stop dead.
  2. Apply the rescue breathing pattern that was practised in training.
  3. Breathe in through the nose, keeping the throat and jaw loose.
  4. Expect the airway to open within a few minutes; do not add reliever inhaler if asthma has been excluded.
  5. Resume at lower intensity once breathing settles.
Call 000 nowBlue lips, or collapse. This is not a typical EILO episode — do not assume it is the larynx.
Emergency department todayBreathlessness that does not settle within a few minutes of stopping, occurs at rest, is accompanied by chest pain, or that is new and unexplained, is not a typical EILO episode either.

Medications

Medications for EILO

There is no drug treatment for EILO itself. Medication is directed at the conditions that sit alongside it — intranasal corticosteroid for rhinitis, proton pump inhibitor therapy for reflux where confirmed, and inhaled corticosteroid for co-existing asthma. Inhaled ipratropium and other agents have been tried without a reliable evidence base.

Why reliever inhalers often do not help

A short-acting beta-agonist dilates the bronchi. EILO obstructs at the larynx, above them, so there is little for the drug to act on — one reason a poor reliever response in an athlete with exertional symptoms should prompt reassessment rather than dose escalation.7 Where exercise-induced bronchoconstriction is genuinely present as well, the reliever is still indicated for that component, alongside warm-up and environmental measures.10 Do not stop prescribed asthma treatment without discussing it with the prescriber first.

Living with EILO

Sport and training

EILO is not a reason to stop exercising, and avoidance makes matters worse by reducing fitness and increasing anticipatory anxiety. A structured warm-up, awareness of cold or dry air, and a rehearsed rescue technique allow most people to train and compete at full intensity.

School, work and coaches

People around the athlete need to know what an episode looks like, that it settles quickly, and that it is not an asthma attack. A brief written explanation for coaches, teachers or a workplace prevents well-meant but unhelpful responses — and prevents the athlete being pulled out of sport unnecessarily.

Confidence and anxiety

Anxiety commonly develops after repeated frightening episodes rather than causing them. Framing EILO as a mechanical problem of laryngeal control that responds to training addresses both the symptom and the fear. Where anxiety is prominent it is treated in its own right, not as a substitute for laryngeal therapy.

Sleep and general health

Symptoms are exercise-bound, so sleep is typically unaffected. Breathlessness at night or at rest suggests another diagnosis and warrants review.

Prognosis

The outlook is good. Most people improve substantially with explanation and breathing retraining, and many adolescents improve further with growth. The main determinants of a poor outcome are diagnostic delay — often several years, during which sport may be abandoned — untreated co-morbidity, and technique that has never been practised at the intensity where symptoms occur.14 Severe supraglottic collapse that persists despite good therapy has a surgical option with favourable results.13

Role of the physiotherapist

The physiotherapist is central to EILO management rather than adjunctive. They take the history that separates laryngeal from bronchial symptoms and refer for continuous laryngoscopy exercise testing where indicated, teach and progress laryngeal control and breathing retraining, rehearse the rescue pattern at true exercise intensity, apply inspiratory muscle training as an adjunct, screen for coexisting dysfunctional breathing, and rebuild confidence and training load.3 They also work with the medical team on whether asthma therapy is still warranted.12

Part 1 · References

  1. Halvorsen T, Walsted ES, Bucca C, et al. Inducible laryngeal obstruction: an official joint European Respiratory Society and European Laryngological Society statement. Eur Respir J 2017;50(3):1602221.
  2. Christensen PM, Heimdal JH, Christopher KL, et al. ERS/ELS/ACCP 2013 international consensus conference nomenclature on inducible laryngeal obstructions. Eur Respir Rev 2015;24(137):445–450.
  3. Røksund OD, Heimdal JH, Clemm H, Vollsæter M, Halvorsen T. Exercise inducible laryngeal obstruction: diagnostics and management. Paediatr Respir Rev 2017;21:86–94.
  4. Hull JH, Backer V, Gibson PG, Fowler SJ. Laryngeal dysfunction: assessment and management for the clinician. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;194(9):1062–1072.
  5. Christensen PM, Thomsen SF, Rasmussen N, Backer V. Exercise-induced laryngeal obstructions: prevalence and symptoms in the general public. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268(9):1313–1319.
  6. Nielsen EW, Hull JH, Backer V. High prevalence of exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013;45(11):2030–2035.
  7. Walsted ES, Hull JH, Sverrild A, Porsbjerg C, Backer V. Bronchial provocation testing does not detect exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction. J Asthma 2017;54(1):77–83.
  8. Heimdal JH, Roksund OD, Halvorsen T, Skadberg BT, Olofsson J. Continuous laryngoscopy exercise test: a method for visualising laryngeal dysfunction during exercise. Laryngoscope 2006;116(1):52–57.
  9. Maat RC, Roksund OD, Halvorsen T, et al. Audiovisual assessment of exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction: reliability and validity of observations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266(12):1929–1936.
  10. Parsons JP, Hallstrand TS, Mastronarde JG, et al. An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187(9):1016–1027.
  11. Olin JT, Clary MS, Fan EM, et al. Therapeutic laryngoscopy during exercise: a novel non-surgical therapy for refractory EILO. Eur Respir J 2017;50(2):1601395.
  12. Sandnes A, Andersen T, Hilland M, et al. Laryngeal movements during inspiratory muscle training in healthy subjects. J Voice 2013;27(4):448–453.
  13. Norlander K, Johansson H, Jansson C, Nordvall L, Nordang L. Surgical treatment is effective in severe cases of exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction: a follow-up study. Acta Otolaryngol 2015;135(11):1152–1159.
  14. Shay EO, Sayad E, Milstein CF. Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) in children and young adults: from referral to diagnosis. Laryngoscope 2020;130(6):E400–E406.

References are numbered in citation order (Vancouver/BMJ style) and were current at the time of writing. Guidelines are living documents — verify against the latest version before clinical use.

How we treat this at the clinic

More than one of our services applies here, and which combination suits you depends on what your assessment shows.

Part 2 of 2

Clinical evidence

Part 1 covers the same condition without the technical detail. What follows is the evidence base behind it, written for clinicians — the literature, the reasoning and the gaps.

For clinicians: this summary supports clinical reasoning and is not a protocol. Check current guidelines and local policy before applying it, and read it alongside the key references and guidelines directory.

Framing. Exercise-Induced Laryngeal Obstruction (EILO) is the exercise-triggered subtype of inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO), defined in the joint European Respiratory Society / European Laryngological Society statement as transient, reversible narrowing of the larynx in response to a trigger.1 The clinically consequential point is diagnostic rather than therapeutic: exertional dyspnoea that has failed inhaled therapy is frequently laryngeal, and no amount of asthma escalation will treat it. The treatment is behavioural, delivered by physiotherapy or speech pathology, which makes this one of the conditions where the physiotherapist holds the primary intervention rather than an adjunct.

Diagnosis and misdiagnosis

  • Bronchial provocation testing does not detect laryngeal obstruction; a negative challenge excludes exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) and says nothing about the larynx, and a positive one does not exclude concurrent EILO.2 Treating a provocation result as a complete answer to exertional dyspnoea is the commonest reasoning error in this group.
  • The reference standard is the continuous laryngoscopy exercise (CLE) test — direct visualisation of the larynx at peak effort, at the moment symptoms occur.3 Resting laryngoscopy is typically normal and has no rule-out value.
  • Obstruction is graded separately at supraglottic and glottic level on a validated observational scoring system, which is what makes severity and treatment response comparable across time and centres.4
  • Inspiratory flow–volume loop truncation is suggestive during symptoms but lacks sensitivity and specificity; it supports, never establishes, the diagnosis.1
  • Where CLE testing is unavailable, a structured history carries most of the diagnostic weight — inspiratory difficulty, throat-level tightness, onset at peak intensity, resolution within minutes — and should trigger referral rather than empirical escalation.5

Epidemiology and who to suspect

  • Population prevalence in adolescents and young adults is approximately 5–7%, with a female predominance.6
  • In athletes investigated for unexplained exertional breathlessness, prevalence is far higher — around a third in referred series — making EILO a leading differential rather than a rarity.7
  • EILO and EIB coexist often enough that finding one does not close the assessment; the two produce different symptom timing and phase, which the history can usually separate.5

Behavioural therapy — the primary treatment

  • Laryngeal control therapy and breathing retraining are first-line and are supported across cohort and case-series evidence; randomised data are sparse, and the literature's weakness is trial design, not clinical signal.8
  • Education alone produces meaningful benefit in a proportion of patients — understanding the mechanism reduces the panic that amplifies obstruction. This is an intervention, not a preliminary.8
  • Technique must be rehearsed at the ventilatory intensity at which symptoms occur. Skills trained only at rest do not transfer to peak effort, which is the usual reason a "failed" therapy trial has in fact never been tested.
  • Therapeutic laryngoscopy during exercise — real-time visual biofeedback while applying the breathing technique — improves outcomes in patients refractory to therapy alone, and is a reasonable step before considering surgery.9
  • Inspiratory muscle training is a plausible adjunct: resisted inspiration is associated with an actively widened laryngeal inlet and a slower inspiratory pattern, and it provides a structured home programme.10 Evidence for symptom outcomes in EILO specifically remains thin; use it to supplement laryngeal retraining, not to replace it.

Surgery

  • Supraglottoplasty is effective in severe, therapy-resistant supraglottic collapse confirmed on CLE testing, with improvement in symptoms and exercise capacity in selected patients.11
  • It addresses supraglottic collapse only and has no role in glottic obstruction — another reason the CLE grading matters before any surgical conversation.4

Clinical reasoning

  • Phase and timing are the discriminators. Inspiratory difficulty at peak effort resolving in minutes points laryngeal; expiratory wheeze 5–15 minutes post-exercise responding to a reliever points bronchial.5
  • A poor reliever response is data, not treatment failure. It should prompt reassessment of the diagnosis before dose escalation — a principle that also holds in the wider difficult-asthma pathway.12
  • Screen the amplifiers — rhinitis, laryngopharyngeal reflux, chronic cough, dysfunctional breathing — because untreated laryngeal irritability limits the therapy response and is often read as non-response.5
  • Anxiety is usually consequence, not cause. Framing EILO as a mechanical control problem is both accurate and therapeutic; attributing it primarily to psychology is neither, and delays effective treatment.
  • Do not deprescribe asthma therapy unilaterally. Where EILO is the sole diagnosis, withdrawal of inhaled therapy is appropriate but belongs with the prescriber, on documented evidence.

Evidence gaps

  • No randomised comparison of breathing-retraining protocols; optimal content, dose and durability are unknown.
  • Outcome measurement is inconsistent — CLE grade, symptom scores and return-to-sport are not interchangeable, and few studies report all three.
  • Access to CLE testing is limited outside specialist centres in Australia, so much practice rests on history-based diagnosis whose accuracy has not been formally quantified.
  • The role and dosing of inspiratory muscle training in EILO specifically is largely extrapolated from healthy-subject laryngeal imaging.10
  • Little evidence addresses recurrence, long-term outcome into adulthood, or which patients need surgery rather than further therapy.

References for the clinical evidence summary

  1. Halvorsen T, Walsted ES, Bucca C, et al. Inducible laryngeal obstruction: an official joint European Respiratory Society and European Laryngological Society statement. Eur Respir J 2017;50(3):1602221.
  2. Walsted ES, Hull JH, Sverrild A, Porsbjerg C, Backer V. Bronchial provocation testing does not detect exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction. J Asthma 2017;54(1):77–83.
  3. Heimdal JH, Roksund OD, Halvorsen T, Skadberg BT, Olofsson J. Continuous laryngoscopy exercise test: a method for visualising laryngeal dysfunction during exercise. Laryngoscope 2006;116(1):52–57.
  4. Maat RC, Roksund OD, Halvorsen T, et al. Audiovisual assessment of exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction: reliability and validity of observations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266(12):1929–1936.
  5. Hull JH, Backer V, Gibson PG, Fowler SJ. Laryngeal dysfunction: assessment and management for the clinician. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;194(9):1062–1072.
  6. Christensen PM, Thomsen SF, Rasmussen N, Backer V. Exercise-induced laryngeal obstructions: prevalence and symptoms in the general public. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268(9):1313–1319.
  7. Nielsen EW, Hull JH, Backer V. High prevalence of exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013;45(11):2030–2035.
  8. Røksund OD, Heimdal JH, Clemm H, Vollsæter M, Halvorsen T. Exercise inducible laryngeal obstruction: diagnostics and management. Paediatr Respir Rev 2017;21:86–94.
  9. Olin JT, Clary MS, Fan EM, et al. Therapeutic laryngoscopy during exercise: a novel non-surgical therapy for refractory EILO. Eur Respir J 2017;50(2):1601395.
  10. Sandnes A, Andersen T, Hilland M, et al. Laryngeal movements during inspiratory muscle training in healthy subjects. J Voice 2013;27(4):448–453.
  11. Norlander K, Johansson H, Jansson C, Nordvall L, Nordang L. Surgical treatment is effective in severe cases of exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction: a follow-up study. Acta Otolaryngol 2015;135(11):1152–1159.
  12. Chung KF, Wenzel SE, Brozek JL, et al. International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur Respir J 2014;43(2):343–373.
Important: This page is general information, not medical advice. If your breathing or symptoms change suddenly or severely, seek urgent medical care. For personalised assessment, contact Inspire Clinic.

Corrections: If something on this page is wrong, out of date or unclear, we want to know. Email reception@inspireclinic.au with the page name and what you believe is incorrect. Substantive corrections are made promptly, and the guide’s version and last-updated date are changed to reflect it.