Transplantation

Lung Transplantation

A transplanted lung cannot feel secretions, cannot mount a normal cough, and is under lifelong immune attack. Rehabilitation before and after is not an adjunct to the operation — it is part of it.

For health professionals
Heart Transplantation Surgery & Procedures · 29 of 29 Last in this area
Authorship & review
Dr Sean James Ledger, BSc Physio (Hons) MSc PhD FHEA
Director and Principal Physiotherapist
Ahpra registration PHY0002298174
Version
1.0
Last updated
12 August 2026
Next review
12 August 2027
Every guide on this site is reviewed at least once a year, and sooner when the evidence changes.
How these guides are written and reviewed →
In plain language

A lung transplant replaces one or both diseased lungs with donated ones. It can transform breathing, but it is not a cure — it exchanges one serious condition for another, requiring lifelong medication and close monitoring. Importantly, the new lungs cannot feel irritation the way your own did, so coughing has to become something done deliberately rather than automatically.

Who is transplanted, and why

Lung transplantation is offered for end-stage lung disease where predicted survival without it is poor and function is severely limited. The main indications are chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and emphysema (including alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency), interstitial lung disease, particularly idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis, and pulmonary arterial hypertension.1

The proportion of transplants performed for cystic fibrosis has fallen markedly since CFTR modulator therapy became widely available, while transplantation for fibrotic disease has grown. Frailty and deconditioning are increasingly recognised as modifiable determinants of listing and outcome, which places physiotherapy directly in the selection pathway.1

Bilateral transplantation is now the dominant procedure, usually via a clamshell incision or bilateral anterior thoracotomies. Single lung transplantation is still used selectively, most often in fibrotic disease. Heart–lung transplantation is now rare, reserved largely for Eisenmenger physiology and complex congenital disease.

The denervated lung — the fact that changes everything

There is no cough reflex below the anastomosis

The donor lung is disconnected from vagal afferents distal to the bronchial anastomosis. The patient does not feel secretions in the transplanted lung and will not cough spontaneously in response to them. Clearance must therefore be scheduled and deliberate, not symptom-driven. A recipient who reports "no sputum" may still have significant retention.

Alongside denervation, several other mechanisms impair clearance simultaneously:

In single lung transplantation the two lungs behave completely differently. In emphysema the native lung remains hyperinflated and compliant and can compress the graft; in fibrosis the native lung remains stiff. Positioning and ventilation strategies must account for which lung is which.

Rejection and chronic allograft dysfunction

Acute cellular rejection is common in the first year and may present with breathlessness, cough, a fall in spirometry or nothing at all. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the main limitation on long-term survival, and is defined by a persistent fall in FEV1 of 20% or more from the established post-transplant baseline, subdivided into obstructive (bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome) and restrictive phenotypes.2

This has a direct practical consequence: home spirometry is a surveillance tool, not a physiotherapy outcome measure. A sustained drop that the patient reports to you should be escalated to the transplant service the same day, not attributed to deconditioning or a chest infection.

Why exercise capacity stays limited

Recipients often achieve near-normal spirometry and yet peak oxygen uptake typically remains around 40–60% of predicted. The limitation is peripheral, not ventilatory:

Because the limitation is muscular, the treatment is training — and specifically resistance training alongside aerobic work. Ventilatory reserve is usually ample, so patients can and should be pushed harder than their history suggests.

Rehabilitation before and after

Before

Pulmonary rehabilitation in transplant candidates improves exercise capacity and quality of life, and pre-transplant functional status predicts post-transplant outcome.3,4 Programmes must be flexible — candidates deteriorate, are frequently admitted, and may be on oxygen or non-invasive ventilation. Training with high-flow oxygen, interval formats and continuous monitoring are all routine. Maintaining muscle mass through the waiting period is the central goal.

After

A randomised trial of structured exercise training after lung transplantation demonstrated improved daily physical activity and reduced blood pressure at one year, and structured rehabilitation is now standard of care.5 Practical priorities:

Role of the physiotherapist

Before listing, maintain and document function — it influences candidacy and outcome. After transplant, teach clearance as a scheduled discipline rather than a response to symptoms, train hard against a peripheral limitation, monitor for the spirometric fall that signals rejection or CLAD, and escalate rather than manage it. Work within the transplant service's protocols; these patients are managed centrally and local improvisation is rarely welcome.

Related: Cystic Fibrosis, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Pulmonary Hypertension.

For health professionals

Evidence summary

Framing. Lung transplantation has the poorest long-term survival of any solid organ transplant, with chronic lung allograft dysfunction the dominant limitation.2 Physiotherapy is embedded on both sides of the operation — in candidacy assessment and conditioning before, and in clearance, rehabilitation and surveillance after — and the evidence base, while modest, is directionally consistent.3

Evidence — rehabilitation

Systematic review supports pulmonary rehabilitation in candidates for improvement in exercise capacity and quality of life while waiting.4 Langer's randomised trial after transplantation showed improved daily physical activity and reduced blood pressure at 12 months.5 Wickerson and colleagues provide the most usable evidence-informed clinical framework spanning the pre- and post-transplant phases.3

Physiotherapy implications

The three practice-defining facts are denervation below the anastomosis, a peripheral rather than ventilatory exercise limitation, and FEV1 as a rejection surveillance variable. Each inverts a habit: clearance becomes scheduled rather than symptom-led; training intensity is set by muscle rather than breathlessness; and a falling FEV1 is escalated rather than trained through.

Evidence gaps

Airway clearance regimens after transplantation are governed by unit protocol rather than trial evidence, and no study has compared scheduled with symptom-led clearance in a denervated lung. Optimal training prescription — intensity, resistance component, duration — is undefined, as is how to sustain gains after supervised programmes end. Rehabilitation in established CLAD is almost entirely unstudied.

References & evidence base

  1. Leard LE, Holm AM, Valapour M, et al. Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: an update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2021;40(11):1349–1379.
  2. Verleden GM, Glanville AR, Lease ED, et al. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction: definition, diagnostic criteria, and approaches to treatment. J Heart Lung Transplant 2019;38(5):493–503.
  3. Wickerson L, Rozenberg D, Janaudis-Ferreira T, et al. Physical rehabilitation for lung transplant candidates and recipients: an evidence-informed clinical approach. World J Transplant 2016;6(3):517–531.
  4. Hoffman M, Chaves G, Ribeiro-Samora GA, Britto RR, Parreira VF. Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in lung transplant candidates: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2017;7(2):e013445.
  5. Langer D, Burtin C, Schepers L, et al. Exercise training after lung transplantation improves participation in daily activity: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant 2012;12(6):1584–1592.

References are numbered in citation order (Vancouver/BMJ style) and were current at the time of writing. Guidelines are living documents — verify against the latest version before clinical use.

How we treat this at the clinic

More than one of our services applies here, and which combination suits you depends on what your assessment shows.

Important: This page is general information, not medical advice. If your breathing or symptoms change suddenly or severely, seek urgent medical care. For personalised assessment, contact Inspire Clinic.

Corrections: If something on this page is wrong, out of date or unclear, we want to know. Email reception@inspireclinic.au with the page name and what you believe is incorrect. Substantive corrections are made promptly, and the guide’s version and last-updated date are changed to reflect it.