Cardiac conditions

Wolff–Parkinson–White Syndrome

An extra electrical connection between the upper and lower chambers of the heart, causing episodes of very fast heartbeat — and curable in most people with a single procedure.

For patients & health professionals
Ventricular Arrhythmias A–Z of Conditions · 83 of 86 X-linked Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Authorship & review
Dr Sean James Ledger, BSc Physio (Hons) MSc PhD FHEA
Director and Principal Physiotherapist
Ahpra registration PHY0002298174
Version
1.0
Last updated
1 September 2026
Next review
1 September 2027
Every guide on this site is reviewed at least once a year, and sooner when the evidence changes.
How these guides are written and reviewed →
Part 1 · In plain language

Normally the electrical signal that makes the heart beat travels from the top chambers to the bottom ones through a single controlled gateway, which briefly slows it down. In Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome there is a second connection — an extra strand of muscle present since birth — that bypasses that gateway. Most of the time it causes nothing. Sometimes the signal circles round the two routes and the heart races, often suddenly and at well over 200 beats a minute. It shows up on an ECG, and in most people a single procedure removes the extra pathway permanently.

Definition

Wolff–Parkinson–White (WPW) describes the presence of an accessory pathway — an additional electrical connection between the atria and the ventricles — that conducts impulses outside the normal atrioventricular node.1,3

A distinction runs through everything that follows:

The distinction matters because the management differs, and because a great many people with the pattern will never develop the syndrome.6,7 It was first described in 1930 in young, otherwise healthy people with a short PR interval and paroxysmal tachycardia.3

Pathophysiology

The delta wave

Because the accessory pathway lacks the deliberate delay built into the AV node, part of the ventricle is activated early — pre-excitation. On the ECG this produces a short PR interval and a slurred upstroke at the start of the QRS complex, the delta wave.1,11

Re-entry tachycardia

With two connections between atria and ventricles, a circuit exists. An appropriately timed extra beat can set the impulse circling — down one route and back up the other — producing atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia, typically 150–250 beats per minute with an abrupt start and stop.1,2

The dangerous combination

The serious risk is different, and it is worth stating precisely. If atrial fibrillation develops, the atria fire chaotically at very high rates. The AV node protects the ventricles by filtering most of those impulses. An accessory pathway with rapid conduction does not filter, so the ventricles can be driven at extreme rates and may degenerate into ventricular fibrillation.8 This mechanism, described in 1979, is why WPW carries a small but genuine risk of sudden death, and why certain drugs used for atrial fibrillation are dangerous here.1,8

Symptoms

Episodes often begin in adolescence or early adulthood, and are commonly mistaken for anxiety or panic — an abrupt onset and offset, and a rate too fast to count, distinguish them.1

Diagnosis

Management

A specific warning: certain drugs that block the AV node — including verapamil, diltiazem and digoxin — can be dangerous in atrial fibrillation with pre-excitation, because they push conduction down the accessory pathway.1,2 Anyone with WPW should carry this information.

Co-morbidities and complications

Medications

Prescribing sits with the cardiologist. Listed here so the reasoning is visible.

Prognosis

For most people the outlook is excellent, and often curative — an unusual word in cardiology. Successful ablation removes the pathway, and with it the arrhythmia and the associated risk; long-term registry follow-up supports durable freedom from recurrence.5,9

Untreated, the risk of a life-threatening event is low but not zero, and is concentrated in those with pathways capable of very rapid conduction.6,8,12 Prospective follow-up of asymptomatic children found that most remained event-free, with events clustering in a minority identifiable by electrophysiological testing.7

Living with it

Before treatment, three things matter: knowing how to perform a vagal manoeuvre, knowing when an episode warrants an ambulance, and carrying a note about the drugs to avoid.1,2

After successful ablation most people return to entirely normal activity, including competitive sport, once the cardiologist confirms the pathway is gone.10

Role of the physiotherapist

WPW is not a physiotherapy condition, and it would be dishonest to present it as one. Diagnosis, risk assessment and ablation are cardiology and electrophysiology work, and this page exists mainly so that people who have been given the diagnosis can understand it.

There are three situations in which we are genuinely useful:

We do not assess arrhythmia risk, advise on ablation, or clear anyone for competitive sport — those decisions belong with the cardiologist. If you have not yet been assessed and you are having episodes, that assessment comes first.

How we treat this at the clinic

WPW is treated by cardiology, and ablation usually cures it. We see people afterwards — often years of avoiding exertion have left them deconditioned and wary long after the pathway is gone. Graded, supervised return to exercise fixes that. We also assess breathing pattern where palpitations persist and your cardiologist has excluded recurrence.

Cardiorespiratory Rehabilitation →Physiotherapy Assessment →

Part 1 · References

  1. Brugada J, Katritsis DG, Arbelo E, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardia. Eur Heart J 2020;41(5):655–720.
  2. Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation 2016;133(14):e506–e574.
  3. Wolff L, Parkinson J, White PD. Bundle-branch block with short P-R interval in healthy young people prone to paroxysmal tachycardia. Am Heart J 1930;5(6):685–704.
  4. Cohen MI, Triedman JK, Cannon BC, et al. PACES/HRS expert consensus statement on the management of the asymptomatic young patient with a Wolff-Parkinson-White electrocardiographic pattern. Heart Rhythm 2012;9(6):1006–1024.
  5. Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Manguso F, et al. Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in the era of catheter ablation: insights from a registry study of 2169 patients. Circulation 2014;130(10):811–819.
  6. Obeyesekere MN, Leong-Sit P, Massel D, et al. Risk of arrhythmia and sudden death in patients with asymptomatic preexcitation: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2012;125(19):2308–2315.
  7. Santinelli V, Radinovic A, Manguso F, et al. The natural history of asymptomatic ventricular pre-excitation: a long-term prospective follow-up study of 184 asymptomatic children. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53(3):275–280.
  8. Klein GJ, Bashore TM, Sellers TD, et al. Ventricular fibrillation in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. N Engl J Med 1979;301(20):1080–1085.
  9. Calkins H, Yong P, Miller JM, et al. Catheter ablation of accessory pathways, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, and the atrioventricular junction. Circulation 1999;99(2):262–270.
  10. Zipes DP, Link MS, Ackerman MJ, et al. Eligibility and disqualification recommendations for competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities: Task Force 9 — arrhythmias and conduction defects. Circulation 2015;132(22):e315–e325.
  11. Bhatia A, Sra J, Akhtar M. Preexcitation syndromes. Curr Probl Cardiol 2016;41(3):99–137.
  12. Kim SS, Knight BP. Long term risk of Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern and syndrome. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2017;27(4):260–268.
Part 2 of 2

Clinical evidence

Part 1 covers the same condition without the technical detail. What follows is the evidence base behind it, written for clinicians — the literature, the reasoning and the gaps.

For clinicians: this summary supports clinical reasoning and is not a protocol. Check current guidelines and local policy before applying it, and read it alongside the key references and guidelines directory.

Framing. Ventricular pre-excitation is present in roughly 1–3 per 1,000 of the population, and the central clinical problem is not treating symptomatic re-entrant tachycardia — which is well solved — but deciding what to do about the asymptomatic ECG pattern.1,11,12 The entity has been recognised since the 1930 description of a short PR interval with paroxysmal tachycardia in otherwise healthy young people, and that cohort framing — young, well, incidentally identified — still describes most of the diagnostic dilemma.3 The 2019 ESC supraventricular tachycardia guideline and the 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS document give the framework; the 2012 PACES/HRS consensus addresses the asymptomatic young patient specifically.1,2,4

The risk is real, quantified, and small

Meta-analysis of asymptomatic pre-excitation puts the rate of sudden cardiac death at approximately 0.1% per year, an order of magnitude lower than historic estimates from symptomatic referral populations.6 The mechanism is unchanged from the 1979 description: pre-excited atrial fibrillation conducting rapidly down an accessory pathway and degenerating to ventricular fibrillation.8 The risk therefore tracks the pathway's refractory period rather than the presence of symptoms, which is why symptom status alone is an inadequate stratifier.4,6

Non-invasive markers of a low-risk pathway — intermittent pre-excitation, abrupt loss of the delta wave on exercise — are useful when present but poorly sensitive when absent.4,12

Ablation has shifted the risk–benefit calculation

Catheter ablation of accessory pathways achieves acute success above 90–95% with low major complication rates in experienced centres, and registry follow-up of 2,169 patients supports durable outcome.5,9 Because the procedural risk has fallen faster than the arrhythmic risk has been revised downwards, the threshold for offering ablation to asymptomatic patients has moved, and current guidance supports electrophysiological assessment with ablation of high-risk pathways rather than universal observation.1,4,5 Prospective paediatric follow-up nonetheless found most asymptomatic children remained event-free, so the decision remains individualised.7

Pharmacological hazard in pre-excited atrial fibrillation

AV nodal blocking agents — verapamil, diltiazem, digoxin — may accelerate conduction over the accessory pathway during atrial fibrillation and precipitate ventricular fibrillation.1,2 This is a well-established contraindication that is nonetheless periodically breached in acute settings, and it is worth documenting prominently in any record a patient carries.2

Exercise and sport

Task Force 9 recommendations address arrhythmias and conduction defects in competitive athletes, and pre-excitation in an athlete is generally an indication for evaluation, with ablation frequently offered because it resolves eligibility definitively.10 For a physiotherapy service the relevant point is post-procedural rather than diagnostic. After confirmed successful ablation the patient has no ongoing arrhythmic restriction, yet deconditioning and exertional apprehension accumulated over years of symptomatic episodes commonly persist — and there is no trial evidence guiding reconditioning in this specific population, so practice is extrapolated from general cardiac rehabilitation.5,10

What we do not know

  • How to identify the high-risk pathway non-invasively. Existing markers have useful specificity and inadequate sensitivity, which is why invasive assessment persists.4,6,12
  • Whether ablating all asymptomatic pre-excitation is net beneficial at population level, given a procedural complication rate acting against a 0.1%-per-year event rate.5,6
  • The natural history into later adulthood, since most cohorts follow children and young adults.7,12
  • How best to recondition patients after ablation; no trial addresses this group specifically.5,10

References for the clinical evidence summary

  1. Brugada J, Katritsis DG, Arbelo E, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardia. Eur Heart J 2020;41(5):655–720.
  2. Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation 2016;133(14):e506–e574.
  3. Wolff L, Parkinson J, White PD. Bundle-branch block with short P-R interval in healthy young people prone to paroxysmal tachycardia. Am Heart J 1930;5(6):685–704.
  4. Cohen MI, Triedman JK, Cannon BC, et al. PACES/HRS expert consensus statement on the management of the asymptomatic young patient with a Wolff-Parkinson-White electrocardiographic pattern. Heart Rhythm 2012;9(6):1006–1024.
  5. Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Manguso F, et al. Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in the era of catheter ablation: insights from a registry study of 2169 patients. Circulation 2014;130(10):811–819.
  6. Obeyesekere MN, Leong-Sit P, Massel D, et al. Risk of arrhythmia and sudden death in patients with asymptomatic preexcitation: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2012;125(19):2308–2315.
  7. Santinelli V, Radinovic A, Manguso F, et al. The natural history of asymptomatic ventricular pre-excitation: a long-term prospective follow-up study of 184 asymptomatic children. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53(3):275–280.
  8. Klein GJ, Bashore TM, Sellers TD, et al. Ventricular fibrillation in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. N Engl J Med 1979;301(20):1080–1085.
  9. Calkins H, Yong P, Miller JM, et al. Catheter ablation of accessory pathways, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, and the atrioventricular junction. Circulation 1999;99(2):262–270.
  10. Zipes DP, Link MS, Ackerman MJ, et al. Eligibility and disqualification recommendations for competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities: Task Force 9 — arrhythmias and conduction defects. Circulation 2015;132(22):e315–e325.
  11. Bhatia A, Sra J, Akhtar M. Preexcitation syndromes. Curr Probl Cardiol 2016;41(3):99–137.
  12. Kim SS, Knight BP. Long term risk of Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern and syndrome. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2017;27(4):260–268.
Important: This page is general information, not medical advice. If your breathing or symptoms change suddenly or severely, seek urgent medical care. For personalised assessment, contact Inspire Clinic.

Corrections: If something on this page is wrong, out of date or unclear, we want to know. Email reception@inspireclinic.au with the page name and what you believe is incorrect. Substantive corrections are made promptly, and the guide’s version and last-updated date are changed to reflect it.